Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Let's say, for a newbie: If an opponent has a significant advantage in terms of units and stats, how justified is it, from a gameplay perspective, to attack their territory when a large portion of your own territory remains unexplored? From my, admittedly newbie, perspective, it seems somewhat illogical, because one can assume that the opponent didn't just magically acquire those units and stats; they likely built up their strength by thoroughly exploring and exploiting their own territory. Therefore, the chances of finding something valuable there are probably lower than, for example, in a pink castle or its treasure. Moreover, attacking an opponent with a smaller army and weaker stats seems unwise, as they could easily trap you, especially if they have good control over their territory by week 4. Or was this an unsuccessful suicide attempt?