Foreign ideals are fleeting and do not deserve to exist.

Statements like this can be refuted among educated, intelligent people (and I consider everyone present to be among them). But I wouldn't dare to challenge them in the company of their "bearers" (hooligans? thugs?).

What nonsense. These are just ordinary people. To shun them like lepers or write nasty things about them on forums, to label them – that's low. And unethical.
Besides, some hooligan might be a hundred times better than an intellectual in philosophical debates, and often be right. Strange as it may seem.

That same group of thugs also has its own ideal, but it's an aggressive type of activity and, as a rule, is completely filled with boorish content.

Tell me, Werewolf, how can you call someone's ideals "boorish"? What does that mean? Down-to-earth? Striving for success? And what are your ideals? Elevated, I hope? Knowledge? No? What then? Again, it's not worth labeling things so easily, in my opinion. It's quite easy to do in theory, but when you're faced with a person with their own thoughts, consciousness, and views, it's not so simple. It's not easy to call all these things "worthless," "boorish," because they are no different from any other. And a person considers their own inner world to be important. Don't you think yours is important? Is it more important than someone else's?
So, don't.