Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
You can also use the integral from 0 to b minus a, integral from 0 to b minus a dxdy. ...
No one is arguing – it's just a specific case of what I wrote. Dirty_Player
I think the whole point is that the sides of the square are not parallel to the OX and OY axes.
Actually, the question from Rapper doesn't ask how to find the area of a figure bounded by lines with given equations. The question is how to find the area of a square using a multiple integral, so nothing prevents us from setting the coordinate axes parallel to its sides, and we can even place one of the vertices at the origin so that the figure is in the first quadrant, then the integrals will be from zero. And even in the case of sides that are not parallel to the coordinate axes, an orthogonal transformation of the coordinate system (rotation) does not change the differential of the area, and with its help, the axes can be made parallel to the sides.