Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I would simply leave the results unchanged, or even better, ask those players who played against him and lost points if they agree to accept these technical defeats. Otherwise, it turns out to be like "I lost to him only because he was cheating, otherwise I would have beaten him easily":D. Although, of course, it's up to the organizers... If you want to assign technical defeats, go ahead, but it's a pity for those players who, through their own efforts and without any technical assistance, could have made it into the top three, but now it's like "YOU PLAYED AGAINST A LOSER? - GET A TECHNICAL WIN":D.
It simply creates a precedent; such cases have happened, are happening, and will happen, and the decision that will be made is very important for the future. Perhaps it would be worth including a separate point in the tournament regulations to address this.