Selection for FB-3.

And there is a third option: to award half a point in the game with the cheater who got caught, who was revealing the map

Prove this to me! Once you prove it, I'll immediately award half a point.
First you remembered Alex for some reason, now you're remembering Vitalik. Not very strong on history, but who will be next?

Why, then, in Vitalik's case, were all his victories annulled? It's unlikely anyone even looked at his saves there. Losses were assigned and that's it. If that's not double standards, then what is?

It seems to me that double standards are when the same rules in one tournament are applied differently to different people.
The tournament in which Vitalik was assigned losses was run by another person, it was held on a different resource, under a different system and under different rules, and the situation there was different. There were many saves, many analyses and evidence, and a lot of other things.
Are you even aware that there was far more than just one game in his arsenal?
How can you draw a parallel?
Hardcore assessed the situation adequately and decided not to pour oil on the fire, but no, there are always "fighters for justice"...
Oelm, why are you getting involved in this?
P.S. As if I have nothing better to do than explain obvious things. I have my STATE EXAM tomorrow, please leave me alone. :)