under the jurisdiction of the host or a group of "distinguished" Heroes players, the same old problems persist -- where is the procedure that can change the decision of the AC, the host, or any other authority?
However, it usually ends amicably - either I convince the host that I am right, or they convince me (yes, that also happens sometimes :rolleyes:). This allows such a procedure to be considered effective enough for resolving such tasks.
That is, it's quite difficult for one specific person to evade answering the questions asked, which provides sufficient feedback. One person usually has greater flexibility in their desires and greater concern for their own image than a group does. This, in most cases, allows for constructive dialogue.
A group, on the other hand, is usually bound by an explicit or implicit mutual responsibility; that is, when one member of the group tries to do something, the others slap their wrists. This makes it quite cumbersome and unwieldy in situations requiring a quick response or a revision of behavioral strategy.
Furthermore, the choice of tournaments largely depends on the host's personality. If I don't like the host for some reason, I can simply not sign up for their tournaments. Which I regularly do. In the case of the AC, it turns out you have to choose not the tournaments, but the forum as a whole. Which is kinda not good, after all, HeroesWorld is valued for more than just the AC.
statements on the forum have no direct effect (to put it mildly)));
I don't count on a quick effect; if it does appear, it won't be sooner than six months to a year from now.
as far as I can see, today the forum hosts rely on questionnaires