Well, as you wrote about the development of the hero community with your vision and your participation/indirect or direct/ - here it's just: smile20:
and here's why I still called your posts rambling and asked you again about the AK's wishes, because even now you wrote only 2 sentences about your vision of this issue/calculate the percentage yourself, what it is from the entire post and how much argumentation is in it/
I want the AK to be an authoritative body, and for everyone...
I want the AK to primarily serve to unite the hero community, to serve as a tool for resolving conflicts, and not as a match that ignites them. That's why I vote for those people who are capable of such activities. Those who can look a little further than their own nose. Although I have certain disagreements with some of them.
1) If by authority you mean experience, fairness, honesty, impartiality - then yes
2) The AK primarily serves to unite the hero community
serves as a tool for resolving conflicts
- well, it didn't happen that people go to court with requests for friendship /I want to be friends with my neighbor))/
Of course, this is what you would ideally want - but it won't happen! As soon as respect for the opponent begins to appear, this is the source of "friendship/unity".
The unification of hero communities mainly happens in live tournaments; when you come to a tournament, there has never been a question: which resource are you playing for, there hasn't even been a thought about such a question.
...But didn't you foresee that your decision would push the hero community back almost two years?
If I were an observer and saw that such disrespect for the opponent was happening, and the judge didn't even react - I would personally stop all of this.
P.S. For me, respect for the opponent comes first; everything else is not needed if the first one is not there
