"Knights of Honor"

There seems to be more arguing and rudeness in this tournament than there are ideas related to "Knights of Honor." I don't know what the organizers intend to do, but maybe it's worth reviewing the rules again and starting over? After all, there aren't many of us left.
Although, if you decide to continue, I'm happy to play as is; I'm just playing for fun.

Perhaps I was a bit too harsh in my last post. But I genuinely don't understand your behavior.
To say that we agreed on something... without being participants in the discussion during the rule-making phase...
To say that it's only by invitation and not to include those who were actually invited...
What's the point of having a rule that deliberately provokes conflict???

Who were you so diligently defending the tournament from? - From new participants???
PALADIN was wrong when he said that it was about excluding strong players - all of them without exception...
Why mislead Varg-Nara, who simply became a hostage to the situation and defended a rule that he himself doubted was correct?

Today, it's clear to everyone why people didn't want to play; we just need to learn from this.
Apparently, PALADIN's suggestion to start a second tournament and finish the first one is the right approach. But the problem is that I would then be the winner, and I don't feel like one at all. I lost the first task to many.