PReDS
Auto-translated
Wikk-AK tried to explain the reasons for his decision, it's a pity you didn't notice, but none of the defenders of the AT wanted to listen; all their arguments boiled down to the fact that he didn't need to cheat, there were obvious contradictions in Cobra's testimony (which was the basis for the decision), and that this was due to a lack of seriousness in handling the case, etc. It's a matter of perspective; some consider the prosecution's arguments to be more convincing, while others think the opposite, but at least both sides were expressed, let's stick to the facts.
...
Here's an example of the latest review of a case by Pasha:
Regarding this game (bijho-Castiel), the decision is as follows.
Castiel did not violate the rules of the game.
Justification.
On turn 146, Castiel attacks bijho, and bijho retreats. During the attack, Castiel could have assessed bijho's army and the presence of a tactic that he himself did not have.
Then, on turn 215, Castiel (according to bijho's save) attacks bijho with 7 Angels (although Loshk had the rest of his army and it wasn't small), and bijho has 1 Angel. After Castiel forces bijho with 1 Angel to retreat using a tactic, Castiel has enough mana left to teleport anywhere. However, Castiel, for some reason, visits the Obelisk instead and becomes within reach of bijho. On turn 216, Kirr (Castiel) dies at the hands of Craig (bijho), although Castiel could have bribed him or retreated.
Therefore, the conclusion is: it is obvious that turns 214 and 215 were not made by a human (Castiel), but by the computer.
As a judge of the Seasonal Rating, I consider it inappropriate to review this situation by the AK.
Those who want to see the saves, please contact me: 482-071-082
And one more thing.
I am addressing Castiel.
If you wish, this match will be recorded as your win by awarding (Army, Parameters, Teleport, etc.).
Please reply here about this.
I am addressing bijho.
In the future, please don't act rashly.
...
It may be harsh for some, it may be gentle, it may be incomprehensible for some... But it is completely adequate, personally for me. Anyone who wants to argue about this is welcome to discuss it with me in person in Michurinsk.
