Auto-translated
I just wanted to say that you can do it whenever you want, but it turns out you still disagree with everything, even with the punishment, and you yourself could have awarded the "Champion of Champions" title.
I almost agree with this, if the punishment were milder, but unfortunately, it didn't come from us, and there will always be those who are outraged by a harsh punishment!
For many, the AK brand is not a symbol of infallibility (as Dubrovin tries to portray it); one must defend one's point of view in an open debate. AK avoided this debate, and that is one of the reasons for such a reaction.
But I doubt that, I don't just doubt it, I don't believe it - let's say you were a judicial body, and you gave me the "Champion of Champions" title, and let's see my reaction...
Do you really think that the way AK chose to present the decision (announce the verdict and lock themselves in their office, brushing off with standard phrases) couldn't be fundamentally improved?
As someone who is deeply involved in this matter, I can say that a perfectly achievable result for AK would be: the public loudly demands a ban for Alex and Cobra, the objections of a small group of dissatisfied people are drowned out in this wave, organized resistance either does not exist or quickly fades away under the influence of the arguments of the prosecution, and AK's reputation soars instead of hitting rock bottom, etc.
Whether you believe it or not is your right. It's better to believe it and try to figure out how it could have been done. If you figure it out, you will grow a lot. A small hint: reread all the materials on Vitalik's case; it was simpler, but the principles are similar.
Added 14 minutes later
And Vic is still the same, still trying to change the Heroes world! :D