Once again, the punishment was for the deed, not for swimming in the river.

Now, it doesn't really matter what the punishment was for or how severe it was. If a fight breaks out on the field, the judge is to blame, regardless of how correct his decision was. The AK (Arbitration Committee) failed to defuse the passions surrounding its decision, and as a result, some players left the Hive, and some opposed the AK (which is not right in itself).

This is the main thing I blame the previous AK for. The verdict and the measure of restraint too, but these are minor issues compared to the main one.

I hope you don't doubt that, if I were on the AK, I could have given Alex and Cobra a Champion of Champions title, and everything would have been quiet and calm. Well, they might have grumbled a bit in the VT (Voice Team) chat and in ICQ, and that would be it.

Therefore, the collective recusal (regardless of the reasons) is the most correct decision. It coincided with problems in real life - so much the better, there is an explanation for the supporters. Here, you just need to relieve the AK's image of the Alex case.

In fact, Dubrovin is essentially the last of the Mohicans who tarnished his reputation with this case, and perhaps the one who bears the most responsibility for it (the second Pit, the rest less). If he leaves, the AK's reputation will be free from the mistakes of youth, and it will be possible to start with a credit of trust, including from the opposition (if such a concept as opposition even exists).

But if he doesn't leave, the shadow of Alex's father will continue to hang over the newly elected AK, especially if Dubrovin will be there in the role of chairman or spokesperson or some other prominent position (and he will try). Do you think it's a good idea to keep so many worthy people in opposition to the AK?

And regarding understanding of judging, a couple of blunders in your organizational judging/and as a spectator, you also have blunders/fits the criteria for you to join the AK? - just saying, I'm tired of this nonsense.

I didn't grasp the phrase, please formulate the thought more specifically.

Is this in the sense of "you're not without sin yourself"? I won't argue, there have been times...