scorp
Auto-translated
It's not us who need to be observing, but them showing themselves.
Ideally, the Arbitration Committee should consist of those who have judged a couple of tournaments without scandals, regardless of whether it's an online or offline club. That is, there should be some confidence that the person understands what it means to be a judge and how to behave in that role.
The previous composition of the Arbitration Committee clearly demonstrated a lack of understanding of these things, hence the turmoil.
Once again, the punishment was for the deed, not for swimming in the river.
And regarding understanding of judging, does a couple of flawed moments in your organizational judging/and as a spectator also having flaws/qualify you for the Arbitration Committee? - just saying, I'm tired of this nonsense.
