AK-2 Elections

Almost forgot... there was also a request for suggestions regarding the work of the Arbitration Committee (AK). The general suggestion is as follows: to continuously improve one's own qualifications (because the previous team managed to stumble on some rather simple issues). The easiest way to do this is to directly judge tournaments, preferably prestigious ones, with the potential for controversy, etc. And preferably alone, at least in terms of public statements ("I made the decision"). If a person manages to successfully judge (i.e., bring to a conclusion without scandals) a couple of such tournaments on their own, then in the work of the AK, they will at least not spoil anything, and most likely even improve it. Ideally, the AK should consist only of such people. Maybe, in the future, it will come to this.