Дубровин Павел
Auto-translated
This is precisely the main point.
The majority of complaints submitted to the Arbitration Committee (AK) come from newcomers. Because when experienced players argue with each other, it happens publicly, loudly, and with the participation of most of the active forum members. The judge only needs to avoid interfering with this event and then simply record the will of the people.
However, dealing with newcomers almost always falls to the AK, because their complaints rarely generate enough resonance for broad discussion.
Yura, I have a completely opposite view to your position that the AK should only record the opinion of the Players.
The question is, why elect an AK if the issue can be resolved by the majority of Players without an AK?
I am not against resolving disputed games between experienced players by the opinion of the majority of Players, but then let's remove the AK altogether, rather than leaving the AK with the right to resolve only disputed games involving newcomers.
С истиной где-то рядом...
Лето 2010.
Лето 2010.