Nominations and withdrawals in the Arbitration Committee.

Also, some thoughts regarding the work of the AK, or the judging committee: if a player N suspects player X, then to consider such a claim, player N prepares a complete analysis of player X's game based on the save files, writes down what he considers controversial, what seems suspicious, and what seems logical. Only after that does he have the right to submit this proposal. There shouldn't be something like: "you, take a look at player X's save files, and see if there's anything there."