Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.
Here he is. Here's a classic example of why Hermit is wrong 100 times!!! If every such situation is discussed in the Arbitration Committee, it would drive you crazy... In such a tournament, the organizer should address these nuances, and no one else! When a person plays their first (or one of the first) tournament online game and immediately has a lot of suspicions about the opponent cheating, this is not a matter for the Arbitration Committee, but for a therapist! Vitya did a great job, he explained everything very clearly – RESPECT! That's all from me!
P.S.: I haven't read the logs and won't, on principle!
Dirty Player, I think this wasn't even from a novice tournament, but a ranked game. Who is the organizer, and who should sort it out? And even if it were from a novice tournament or some other tournament, bijho did the right thing by contacting the Arbitration Committee. I don't analyze controversial situations, but I don't think there's much to analyze here. Everything is clear anyway, the opponents are ready to provide information and are not going to drag it out... Even I, based on a small part of the logs that is relevant, was able to immediately understand what happened, let alone the Arbitration Committee.
Всё не так плохо как Вы думаете. Всё намного хуже!