Skip to content

Round table

#1628
Auto-translated
If you move the consa one tile to the left, its belonging to the central zone will be obvious, and capturing it without breaking through the inter-zone guard will no less obviously be considered a violation of the rules for this template.
The ambiguity arises only when determining whether an object belongs to one zone or another. Then we can talk about a disputable situation. In the example I mentioned, or in the original example, everything is quite obvious, as the consa's belonging to a specific zone is clearly visible.
If, on the contrary, the entrance to the consa were in the desert, and the left tile were on its own respawn, then the player who captured the consa, seemingly in violation of the rules, could cite the disputability of the situation.

And for correctly determining the terrain type of a tile on the border of respawns, it is useful to look at the set of soil subtypes (i.e., the set of different images for each type). Then it will become clear by what principle different terrain types are joined on the map, and in most cases it will be possible to determine the terrain type on the border without checking.
You can look this up, for example, in the ERM manual.