Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
The required quorum for making changes to the Online Games Rules.
The rules are refined over years. Changing them back and forth based on the whims of half the forum users is ridiculous. Therefore, I support the second option, although 75 seems a bit high. 2/3 would be possible and sufficient... but in my opinion, there's nothing wrong with being a little more conservative regarding the rules. If someone is capable of coming up with a valuable and rational change, then I think they are also capable of promoting it.
And half is just absurd; we'd have to recalibrate the rules. Even if there are options like 1/2 and 11/12, I would reluctantly vote for the second.