The required quorum for making changes to the Online Games Rules.

The rules are refined over years. Changing them back and forth based on the whims of half the forum users is ridiculous. Therefore, I support the second option, although 75 seems a bit high. 2/3 would be possible and sufficient... but in my opinion, there's nothing wrong with being a little more conservative regarding the rules. If someone is capable of coming up with a valuable and rational change, then I think they are also capable of promoting it. And half is just absurd; we'd have to recalibrate the rules. Even if there are options like 1/2 and 11/12, I would reluctantly vote for the second.