Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
The required quorum for making changes to the Online Games Rules.
I'm for 3 and 7.
P.S. As an alternative: maybe we can use a weighted average percentage? (but please, no need to vote on this, IMHO :) )
Explanation:
Currently, the situation is:
12 - 3 for 50%, 8 - for 66.66%, 11 - for 75%.
Let's calculate...
(12*50 + 8*66.7 + 11*75) / (12 + 8 + 11) = 63,...%
Argument in favor of "+": This more accurately reflects opinions - otherwise, with the current calculation, an absurd situation may arise - more than half believe that more than half of the votes are needed (simply because some are for two-thirds, others for three-quarters - and this division will simply lead to the fact that a simple majority may pass...).
Argument against "-": It's complicated and not a round number :).
Although for me, the number 9 is no more round than 10 (well, we just have 10 fingers...)
P.P.S. I'm not insisting on my calculations at all, just... purely out of love for art ;)
Стратегия - искусство возможного.
Первое правило форума : "Хвалу и клевету приемли равнодушно И не оспаривай глупца" (с)
Новичкам: ВНИМАТЕЛЬНО перечитайте ВЕСЬ первый пост по нижеприведенной ссылке и 90% ваших вопросов отпадут( на остальные 10% с удовольствием отвечу): Правила онлайн игр