Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
The required quorum for making changes to the Online Games Rules.
I chose options 3 and 7 for myself.
Option 3: To change the rules, as many people as possible need to vote for THIS, because everyone will have to play according to them... and 3/4 is the most optimal option of all the proposed ones... and 2/3 is also not bad, but the more votes in favor, the more justified and necessary this decision will be.
I completely disagree with the option of a SIMPLE MAJORITY – this could be just 1 PERSON!!!)))) – and I think you’ll agree that this is not the kind of weight that should outweigh such decisions, because the problem is “universal.”
As for the games, I vote for a minimum of 15!!!
Because after playing such a number of games, a person already gets involved in the online community of the game, playing with a computer and friends on Hotseat, etc., and really begins to understand the essence of things and, in general, what these rules are for and why they exist!
It would be possible to make it 10 games, but this should be the minimum quota, because for people without online experience, these rules are not very clear or significant at first.
IMHO)))