Skip to content
#231
Auto-translated
This very initial system has one significant drawback – it involves an even number of games (4).
Do I really need to repeat over and over again that nothing prevents us from playing one more game?
And then, we got Garuna against Helmar for the first game. There's no point in even playing; it's clear from the start.
What does "we got" mean? Heroes are chosen by the players, right? But there's some logic to it.
Well, if we stick to this option, let's start with 2 random heroes, then mirror them, and if there's a tie, we play a fifth game. Either by cards or again, randomly.
Great, how is this different from what was suggested before?

If you don't want a "chain," fine, we'll do it your way.
With the Warlord, we played in the semi-finals with a choice (we agreed on it). In the first, third, and fifth games, I chose first.
There you go. Since everyone is so smart.

And I know what to pick for the final :smile54:
"Vsev"

Final:
Before the start, each participant lists 11 heroes that the opponent cannot use.
They play until 5 wins.
Hero selection is from the heroes not banned by the opponent. One player creates four games, the other player creates four games, and the ninth game is played on Obsidian Fields. The first player to be listed in the pairing creates the first game. The first player chooses the land, then the second player chooses a hero, then the first player chooses a hero, and the game begins. In the next game, the heroes that played in the previous games do not participate.
I don't think Vsev will mind me copying and pasting the league rules here.

We'll play like this. And I'm not planning on conducting any more experiments.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: den

Users Online 2 users 1389 guests