By the way, good people, please share your opinion on the finale! The options are slightly above in WisTrit's post.
Hmm... No offense to the organizer, of course, but if the heroes are chosen in a chain, rather than selected from a list, then it's pure randomness, and the one who gets luckier with the heroes and this "chain" will win.
In general, it's not bad, but it would be better to let players choose the heroes so that at least something depends on the player, and not on luck.
Added 3 minutes ago
Why not 20 games? Or 50, for example?
The tournament has a certain timeframe (at least ideally).
Added 22 minutes ago
I think everything is clear about the map.
I think everything is clear about "2 duels are played."
Mirror matches are the same 2 duels, only the heroes are swapped.
Some people have expressed the opinion that this is unfair and everything depends on luck. I will remain silent about this.
Perhaps in standard duels, mirror matches are not very popular or relevant.
In this regard, the question: should we change it?
I can suggest the following options:
a) 5 games, map 18, who chooses first is unknown.
b) 5 games and some other map.
c) 5 games and some other system for choosing heroes.
Regarding a) and b), whoever chooses second will win, they will take a counter-hero and that's it.
Therefore, I am in favor of the system initially proposed by the organizer.