Forum

2 Catch. The thing is, we're all different. When what you feel is also felt by most players, then yes, the AK will become unnecessary. But for now, objectively count how many are for and against the AK. Whether this body is good or bad, it was created to help the majority of players. You can say that the majority are not conscious, and the elite cannot be numerous... but the forum itself was built specifically to work not with the elite, but with the main mass of players. This is what allows us to thrive.

You know, it's when people don't see that the rules they created are far from perfect, that there are many mistakes in them, and the logic in them is sometimes flawed. And at the same time, they manage to drag out the analysis of situations, make decisions when they lose their relevance, and they themselves are not quite well-versed in their own rules... Does the majority of players find all this acceptable?
In all sports competitions, whether it's football, hockey, or Formula 1, refereeing decisions are made either during the match, game, or stage, or immediately after them, before the next one begins.
Imagine what it would be like if the stewards in F1 made a decision to disqualify someone like Hamilton five races after he violated the rules... Or if the disciplinary committee disqualified someone like Berezutsky two months after he received a red card.
Moreover, people don't seem to fully understand what falls under their jurisdiction and what doesn't. I hope everyone understood the joke Preds made about their pet peeve in the rules? My post about Vitalik?
The most interesting thing is that the stern people from the AK reacted very harshly to my words. As befits demigods ;)