I've been reading your posts for a while now, and everywhere I see this same nonsensical argument. Skill isn't an indicator in this case. It's like saying that a rich person won't steal because they already have a lot of money. :D
Comparing cheating to looking up the answer at the end of a textbook is absurd, right?
A top student became a top student because they solve problems themselves, not by cheating.
Losers cheat... but if we're talking about nonsense, there's a contradiction in the attack itself: you compared skill to wealth – that's pure nonsense; wealth is more like a tournament result.
Skill, on the other hand, is universal; it's professionalism and mastery, not just money.
And if you have a prejudice, just say it, instead of coming up with pseudo-arguments to support it, demonstrating your own lack of coherence. :(
Let's assume that Loser suddenly appears and says: "Damn, I was attacking, and then my phone rang. It was noisy in the office, so I went out into the hallway. At that time, Vigo was very curious about what I was doing. Curiosity isn't a vice. He looked, deleted the saves, closed the second copy of Heroes, and when he came back, he continued playing and didn't even notice what had happened."
What should be done then? :D
Honestly, it's like dealing with children.
You really need to think about what you're writing sometimes.
By the way, none of the accusers admitted that they weren't happy when they heard about Alex's cheating. I'll assume that everyone was happy – which means that further discussion is pointless. :(
(с) Roger Zelazny