scorp
Auto-translated
I'll post on behalf of Scorp ))),
the message will be "long," so be patient or skip my post.
1) to Vik only
this is not a response to your posts, but a summary of your advocacy, and what it consisted of is that the decisions of the Arbitration Committee
a) were VERY strict
b) was there anything to punish for?
option c) is dismissed regarding the non-awarding of the Champion's Mace
- A) his opinion on such penalties was due to his "alibi"!!!, how would you behave if, through your/I repeat, through your/ fault, a comrade is accused of cheating?
/the other side of this situation, I just can't wrap my head around how a Chaos player could allow such a thing to happen; I wanted to figure out who among my acquaintances could have hacked the map while I was away from the online game for 3 minutes (even though we almost stopped playing) – unfortunately, no one comes to mind/
All the examples are from different sports, which you are twisting; this can also be done with your examples, but let's apply this situation to a club tournament:
a game in two different rooms, Vik is playing, I, Scorp, am sitting next to him and watching the game, you write to the opponent, "let's take a break," he agrees – and you leave/the opponent doesn't smoke and waits/, and I suddenly become very interested in what's happening in the dark and I enter cheats; spectators who don't know either of us/player and player, so to speak/ are watching, and then you return and say it wasn't you ))
- you will most likely be believed/without a replay
- they will believe you but suggest a replay
- they won't believe you and you will receive a penalty/the weakest punishment if the player did it consciously/
- and if they don't believe you, then, as it were, disqualification from the tournament should be!!!
--> --> -->
B) But what about Scorp's silence??? – freedom of thought; if you want, this can also be explained in detail.
2) The lawyer's evidence base )).
It was based on the fact that this is not the right punishment, it can't be done this way, you are naive, there was no violation, who are you anyway – is this proof of innocence? Whose defense are you conducting and who exactly? Your defense goes far beyond this situation/let's say the situation is Alex's house, and you started describing how great it would be to go on a picnic outside the city, etc./
P.S. = how would you behave if, through your/I repeat, through your/ fault, a comrade is accused of cheating?
the message will be "long," so be patient or skip my post.
1) to Vik only
this is not a response to your posts, but a summary of your advocacy, and what it consisted of is that the decisions of the Arbitration Committee
a) were VERY strict
b) was there anything to punish for?
option c) is dismissed regarding the non-awarding of the Champion's Mace
- A) his opinion on such penalties was due to his "alibi"!!!, how would you behave if, through your/I repeat, through your/ fault, a comrade is accused of cheating?
/the other side of this situation, I just can't wrap my head around how a Chaos player could allow such a thing to happen; I wanted to figure out who among my acquaintances could have hacked the map while I was away from the online game for 3 minutes (even though we almost stopped playing) – unfortunately, no one comes to mind/
All the examples are from different sports, which you are twisting; this can also be done with your examples, but let's apply this situation to a club tournament:
a game in two different rooms, Vik is playing, I, Scorp, am sitting next to him and watching the game, you write to the opponent, "let's take a break," he agrees – and you leave/the opponent doesn't smoke and waits/, and I suddenly become very interested in what's happening in the dark and I enter cheats; spectators who don't know either of us/player and player, so to speak/ are watching, and then you return and say it wasn't you ))
- you will most likely be believed/without a replay
- they will believe you but suggest a replay
- they won't believe you and you will receive a penalty/the weakest punishment if the player did it consciously/
- and if they don't believe you, then, as it were, disqualification from the tournament should be!!!
--> --> -->
B) But what about Scorp's silence??? – freedom of thought; if you want, this can also be explained in detail.
2) The lawyer's evidence base )).
It was based on the fact that this is not the right punishment, it can't be done this way, you are naive, there was no violation, who are you anyway – is this proof of innocence? Whose defense are you conducting and who exactly? Your defense goes far beyond this situation/let's say the situation is Alex's house, and you started describing how great it would be to go on a picnic outside the city, etc./
P.S. = how would you behave if, through your/I repeat, through your/ fault, a comrade is accused of cheating?