Skip to content
User Avatar
#939
Auto-translated
Oelm
Imagine a situation where you have to play in a tournament against a Heroes player whom you, for example, suspect of cheating. Wouldn't you try to analyze his games with other players?

words of gold! :)
but there was no analysis at all :( :(
where are even attempts to find wrongdoing not in the horror stories of Micro (whose origin can no longer be reliably established, as disbelief and prejudice are obvious) but specifically in the saves of Alex's games!!!
the fact that a player is prone to cheating (if he is) should be clear from them already
I even now - after the fact - expressed readiness for such an analysis, with all comments and observations handed over to trusted hands for further conclusions

BUT: properly before passing a verdict on cheating, the TC should have bothered to look for more unambiguous evidence derived from saves, based on routes, priorities with/without scouting - plenty of material is available ;)

in other words, improve at their direct job, rather than playing believe-it-or-not with Cobra :D :D
"...the personal strengths and weaknesses of a leader are no true indication of the merits of his cause"

(с) Roger Zelazny