I already asked why, as the organizer, you didn't make a decision on your own, even though it was entirely within your authority, and you, judging by how you voted, were convinced of cheating? Why did you choose to share the responsibility with six other people? All I got was a vague answer about the rules of the Arbitration Committee. A true leader always makes the decision himself and isn't afraid to take responsibility for it. Of course, he can consult, but he won't hide behind the backs of those who advise him.
So, there is some truth in Vik's words, and a lot of it ;)

I wouldn't make a decision about the World Championship alone either. Whether it's Alex or Maxlewis. There's an Arbitration Committee, why take that headache on yourself? I think: the organizer is responsible for the organization, order, and resolving various disputes and misunderstandings. And suspicions of cheating are referred to the Arbitration Committee. They were elected for this, and all of this should, in theory, be written down somewhere. So, why are you attacking Pasha specifically, it's not clear. If you haven't had enough yet, continue to attack the system. Which hasn't been properly tested yet, it needs to be tested and refined, but you...

Pasha, don't bother arguing like that, it doesn't work for you. You're methodical, they're aggressive. Your strength lies in AA, CC, and the Arbitration Committee :cool:
Damn, I can't help but make fun of you.
That's enough. It's like a kindergarten, honestly