I already asked why, as the organizer, you didn't make a unilateral decision, even though it was entirely within your competence, and you, judging by how you voted, were sure of cheating? Why did you choose to share the responsibility with six other people? Nothing but a vague answer about the rules of the Arbitration Committee was received. A true leader always makes the decision himself and is not afraid to take responsibility for it. Of course, he can consult, but he won't hide behind the backs of those who advise him.
So, there is some truth in Vik's words, and a very big one ;)
I'm not afraid to take responsibility, but I want the decision to be well-considered, correct, and qualified, which is why the Arbitration Committee was handling this situation. If there were no Arbitration Committee, I would have naturally made the decision myself.
One mind is good, but two are better.
