I don't understand you, Yura. In the past, I read your posts carefully, and there were often ideas in them that resonated with me. Sometimes I couldn't agree, but I still appreciated the consistency and coherence. But what you're writing about AK and, in general, about those who currently hold different views is just nonsense, and quite low-level nonsense at that. What's the point of all this? Is this some kind of settling of scores?

There is no presumption of innocence, and there can't be in principle. But for an "ordinary person" to delve into this, they really need to strain their brain, which is not easy, considering that their entire life is built on such principles. This presumption (I've always been annoyed by this idiotic term) was invented with one goal in mind – to provide an alibi for a bunch of scoundrels in power. And this is successfully demonstrated to us from time to time, but much more often it is hidden behind the scenes. Objectively, it is impossible to prove even that the world exists, let alone that the perception of a particular person is true and objective; you can read about this in Russell.

As for the extensive base of evidence for the defense: there is no such base! There isn't! There is only the heroic authority of Alex and Cobra. And that is the only argument. It is subjective, but since objectivity is not worth looking for, it is quite strong. Everything else is just fluff.

About democracy and democratic institutions. This is all gone a long time ago; it existed in Novgorod, but now there is not even a parody of democracy in the world, but simply a poorly concealed dictatorship. Democracy has transformed into a "consumer society" democracy, and that is simply impossible. Free, conscious expression of will is only possible when "eating, drinking, sleeping, etc." is not at the top of each individual's life priorities. Otherwise, it is simply manipulation of public opinion.

But let's get back to our sheep. About Cobra and the (lack of) evidence base of the defenders. I personally don't believe what he wrote. Not because it couldn't have happened, but simply because it's not worth believing what he writes. Personally, I was already convinced by this

Yes, I am convinced that half of those present are cheating in one way or another, but I absolutely don't care about this, simply because I know that I play better.

.

So, will the director of the company answer for his rotten words? Who is this half: Numone, Mizrael, FireToSky, or maybe me, Kash, someone else? But this question, of course, will hang in the air without an answer. This is typical of directors. Too bad he didn't present himself as a deputy, for example, of the LDPR.

And there's no need to talk about the damned presumption of innocence everywhere.