Дубровин Павел
Auto-translated
Do you have any thoughts of your own?
Throughout all these discussions, I see only a closed loop in your arguments: "We, the AK, made a decision => The community supported our AK => If you don't like something, vote against us, the AK, in the elections => We, the AK, made a decision => and so on."
It reminds me of a boxer cornered, in a passive-defensive position. Do you think this is appropriate behavior for an organization representing the interests of the community? And what will you do if, at some point, you are not supported? Will you quietly step down? With this approach, wouldn't it be better to hurry up?
Yura, there's no need to add your own interpretation to my words. I always express my own opinion, and if I see pressure being put on the AK as a whole, then I defend the AK as a whole, because the AK is an elected body of the game, not my whim.
С истиной где-то рядом...
Лето 2010.
Лето 2010.