Back then, everyone believed him when he said he didn't do it on purpose. They simply invalidated his save, but they didn't ban him as a cheater. Now, this same person, in a similar situation (in my opinion, the act and its consequences are clearly less severe than the previous one), doesn't believe another person and votes in favor of awarding him the "Champion of Moral Courage" award.

But how else can we describe a decision that led to such consequences? There are now many people who are justifiably dissatisfied, people are leaving the forum, and an opposition to the Arbitration Committee is emerging, etc. None of this existed before.

P.S. I'm looking at your avatar, and with each post, it increasingly reflects your real image:rolleyes: