Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Is an AK (assault rifle) necessary or not in principle? (poll)
Back then, everyone believed him when he said he didn't do it on purpose. They simply invalidated his save, but they didn't ban him as a cheater. Now, this same person, in a similar situation (in my opinion, the act and its consequences are clearly less severe than the previous one), doesn't believe another person and votes in favor of awarding him the "Champion of Moral Courage" award.
No, I don't think so. This person didn't vote for the "Champion of Moral Courage" award; there's no need to make things up. Wicc
But how else can we describe a decision that led to such consequences? There are now many people who are justifiably dissatisfied, people are leaving the forum, and an opposition to the Arbitration Committee is emerging, etc. None of this existed before.
The problem isn't with the Arbitration Committee's decision, but with some kind of conspiracy, someone who was offended by something. This behavior is despicable! If someone wants to leave, let them leave, and stop messing with everyone's heads. Piterius
P.S. I'm looking at your avatar, and with each post, it increasingly reflects your real image:rolleyes: