Neoandy
Auto-translated
The person probably thought the incident was resolved back then. But when the topic resurfaces two months later, how should he react?
So, when we were discussing Vitalik's cheating, I also confirmed the report in my party, and other players who had played with him before also confirmed it. Does that mean Vitalik was right to tell us to go away, just because we confirmed the reports? :rolleyes:
The idea of a confirmed report as a fact that completely resolves the incident has been brought up many times in discussions about Alex. I thought that reasonable people like you would understand that this is not an argument, but rather a consequence of the procedure. After all, I hope everyone understands that at the time the report was confirmed, Player #2 did not have access to the evidence that was "published" by the AC two months later, and he did not have the authority to conduct an in-depth investigation. He acted appropriately – he confirmed the report, and those who were supposed to investigate the matter did so.
I'll also answer you about the traffic cop. Imagine that your violation was recorded by automated systems like "Vizir" and others. As in Europe, you will receive your report and photos from the scene by mail after some time, and usually with the deadline for appeal already passed :D. And what? ;)
Ps: I'm starting to doubt your objectivity. So, you understand and even justify Alex's dissatisfaction, but dissatisfaction with the AC for not wanting to explain things promptly and clearly is a crime?
Zy: Imagine a situation where you (God forbid, in real life) are a defendant in a case involving the recovery of material and moral damages in some civil lawsuit. You are summoned to court, and you say – Ha-ha, go away... I owe nothing to anyone. Those who know me will never believe the fabricated claims of the plaintiff, etc. And you answer all the judge's questions in the same spirit – it's up to you to figure it out, I have nothing to do with it. What do you think, whose favor will the decision be in? :)
Zy-Zy-Zy: I forgot a killer argument for those who rely on analogies with football penalties (stadium disqualification, not team disqualification, etc.). I think everyone has seen at least once how a player (even one who is not directly involved in the violation for which the whistle was blown) is sent off the field for "talking" / disrespecting the referee? :smile29: Isn't that an outrage? :smile01:
