Auto-translated
Well, generally speaking, as far as the first instance is concerned, I understand that one of the Arbitration Committee members made a decision, but the Arbitration Committee didn't even exist back then. Now, the Arbitration Committee's decision is being disregarded as a whole, so investigating the motives of one of its members for this inconsistency is not entirely relevant to the topic.
One of the Arbitration Committee members acted against another member of the Arbitration Committee, but the Arbitration Committee didn't exist yet. ;)
P.S. Tell me, has anyone ever been satisfied with their own punishment in life? For example, a traffic cop stopped you, wrote a ticket for exceeding the speed limit by 5 km/h, and you bowed and said, "Thank you, comrade! Excellent work!" :D
Once, a traffic cop stopped me when I was exceeding the speed limit by 19 km/h on the highway. They were repairing the road, the speed limit was 40 km/h, and I was driving at 59 km/h. He told me I had violated the rules, and I replied, "Well, I violated them, what can I do now? I admit my guilt," and he could see it on my face. And he said, "Don't do it again," and let me go.