Is an AK (assault rifle) necessary or not in principle? (poll)

2Wicc: As always, your posts are very long and tedious, and I'm too lazy to read them. Every now and then, of course, there are smart thoughts, for example about placing responsibility on the organizer, but that's the bare minimum.

Well, her opponents (AK), represented mainly by skilled and authoritative Heroes players, are openly trashing her, and backing it up with quite extensive evidence.

A line flashed by about some authoritative players trashing AK. :confused: I haven't noticed anything. If they're trashing behind her back, that only speaks to the baseness and meanness of these so-called skilled players. Anyone who trashes AK should write about it not in the VT chat, but to me in ICQ. I'll find something to say in response to that!

Regarding the decision that AK supposedly ended up in a puddle and so on... No, she didn't end up in anything. You can disagree with the decision, you can consider it too harsh (maybe it would have been ideal to give both a technical loss and that's it), but you can't consider it inadequate! Why not a World Cup? Because no one convinced me who actually entered the codes. But whoever did it, I believe there should be a punishment... it may be harsh, but it must exist!

2Catch: Oleg! You compared this situation to a similar one in an offline tournament, and how the organizer of that tournament disqualified a player for editing a text file. Well, that organizer was me, and that decision was very difficult for me, just like this one. But just like in that case, there was no cheater label (ban from subsequent tournaments)! So here I am as consistent as ever!

2SergeyY: :D :D :D At least you cheered me up!! :smile54: