Is an AK (assault rifle) necessary or not in principle? (poll)

Let me give an example from my personal experience. I played in a tournament on the Heroes League for the second time... There was one judge and his assistant... A controversial situation arose: My opponent attacked me on the 1st day of the week with a red rush and reinforcements. It also turned out that my opponent ran around after fleeing – this is possible in the 2nd game – a redeemed hero has a full turn... like always 2000 mana points (if we're talking in the language of Heroes 3). And these very controversial situations were considered by two people... who, as it seemed to me, were very biased. The result, I think everyone knows – I left the League (although I was a champion there :)) and the tournaments there stopped, the league died... Of course, one can argue with my words, but the conclusion can be drawn – it is better when, if something is very controversial, as many people as possible judge. It is possible to argue against a couple of judges, but it is more difficult to argue against the whole group – it's like with Forrest – he left society, and who suffered more? It's clear – not society, but the loner. The same with Alex... they made a decision, and there's nothing to argue about.