Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Is an AK (assault rifle) necessary or not in principle? (poll)
Vik, you should go into politics. You have no business being here among this flock of sheep/swarm of flies.
You're practically managing to impose your opinion, relying on your knowledge, intelligence, and erudition, with such image-makers at your disposal as Vova and Ketch. But to achieve something, a thousand isn't enough; you need tens or hundreds of thousands, then fifty, not just five, flies will side with you.
What you're doing now is called a revolution, but as you can see, the local people don't want it. So, I don't think it's worth wasting time and energy. If 90% of respondents supported AK, then their decisions (whether it's exclusion from the tournament, a ban, or a black mark) will also be supported by the majority, including what you call "a blatant fabrication." Well, maybe there will be 10 of you in the opposition in that case, but that's not even an opposition; it's just a pathetic minority with disproportionate ambitions.