numOne
Auto-translated
What do you think I do within the framework of the tournaments that I organize myself?
In the situation with Alex, I have an opinion on how to proceed. And I stand by it. Of course, I am interested in ensuring that the decision I consider to be correct is made.
If you mean that I am biased because I have friendly relations with Alex, that is not the case. If I caught Alex cheating, I would be among the first to accuse him. But since the case is clearly fabricated, I have taken a position closer to my view of the situation, acting as an advocate.
My suggestion is to dissolve the AC and transfer the responsibility for making decisions to the organizers of specific tournaments. Good organizers are not born, they become good through experience and learning from mistakes.
You seem to be fixated on tournaments. I will repeat myself:
1) Not everyone has enough experience to competently resolve game disputes (especially when the situation requires a comprehensive review).
2) Many disputes arise during the season, often concerning newcomers. Who will spend time reviewing, advising, and again, communicating the information to the public?
And do you really think that a person (judge) who removes one player or another from a tournament, based solely on their own view of the situation, will not cause even more disputes? And how can we avoid the so-called "fraternization," where well-known players and personal acquaintances of the judge are treated more leniently than the rest?
Пусть мой враг будет силен и страшен. Если я поборю его, то не буду чувствовать стыда.
