Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.
Obviously, the idea of the AC is supported by the majority of forum members. I am confident that the people who are part of it are capable of learning from their mistakes. When several people leave tournaments as a sign of protest, that is not normal (and among them are not only "Baev's supporters"). I do not understand the resentment — the vote of confidence in the current AC is over 70%. If the percentage were even higher, that would mean the AC is working perfectly, which is obviously not the case.
Overall, I believe the main direction is not settling disputes and ruling the World, but helping forum members. For example, creating a tournament schedule so that it is not either too packed or too sparse, and so on. Various kinds of support for organizers — it does not necessarily have to be conspicuous.
The ideal assessment of the AC's work: just like referees on a football field — when they are neither heard nor seen, as if they are not there. At least, if you don't look too closely.:)