Wise words. After this situation, I came to the conclusion that structures like the Arbitration Committee (AK) are not needed by anyone. If there is a fair judge and organizer, then no arbitration bodies are needed. What did the AK's lawlessness lead to? Someone rightly wrote here that the AK should consist of people who share the same views. And that's how they vote for the AK, consisting of people who share the same views. Therefore, those who look in different directions will not feel comfortable here. And we have seen many times in history what happens when everyone looks in the same direction.

2 Catch.
That's all true, but the AK is still needed. Otherwise, it will be like in real life - whoever is stronger and more arrogant is right. A player differs from an ordinary forum user in that they have a heightened sense of assertiveness. Multiply this by a sharp intellect, and you get a volatile mixture. Even if he is wrong, he will defend his position to the end, as he is used to pulling off difficult situations in the game. And if you also give this person power, then under certain circumstances, he can destroy the forum.
Therefore, there cannot be many people who are capable of working usefully in a representative body of players. On the one hand, it is necessary to have solid authority so that people listen to you, and on the other hand, to put the interests of the forum above personal ones, much higher.

But if the forum leaders pull in different directions, then that is also not good. The Portal was torn apart, the Wings fought on the League and on the Bay, and nothing good came of it in the end.