Kluka
Auto-translated
Not enough.
In my opinion, it's necessary to separate candidates from voters.
A voter is someone who plays online.
1) The most important thing is not to be a clone of another player :-D
2) 5 games per season is too much. I suggest 5 games over 2 seasons leading up to the election (games from the current season are not counted).
3) World ranking should be the main resource for voters. Although it's unlikely that this can be determined formally... maybe it's not necessary.
4) I think the idea about offline players is nonsense.
4.1) 1-2 tournaments... but what if no tournaments were held in the previous season? We only have 3 regular tournaments annually: VK3, VK8, and BB. Summer seasons may not have any tournaments.
4.2) What do offline players have to do with it, if the Arbitration Committee deals with disputes in online games? If a person hardly plays online, then they don't use the services of the Arbitration Committee, so why should they have the right to vote?
A candidate should be a qualified specialist, respected, and morally stable... In general,
1) elected as a result of a vote.
I don't see any other requirements.
It doesn't matter how often they play themselves.
It's all just my opinion.
In my opinion, it's necessary to separate candidates from voters.
A voter is someone who plays online.
1) The most important thing is not to be a clone of another player :-D
2) 5 games per season is too much. I suggest 5 games over 2 seasons leading up to the election (games from the current season are not counted).
3) World ranking should be the main resource for voters. Although it's unlikely that this can be determined formally... maybe it's not necessary.
4) I think the idea about offline players is nonsense.
4.1) 1-2 tournaments... but what if no tournaments were held in the previous season? We only have 3 regular tournaments annually: VK3, VK8, and BB. Summer seasons may not have any tournaments.
4.2) What do offline players have to do with it, if the Arbitration Committee deals with disputes in online games? If a person hardly plays online, then they don't use the services of the Arbitration Committee, so why should they have the right to vote?
A candidate should be a qualified specialist, respected, and morally stable... In general,
1) elected as a result of a vote.
I don't see any other requirements.
It doesn't matter how often they play themselves.
It's all just my opinion.