It's a different matter, but if the AK changes its decision, Alex's delusions of grandeur will increase many times over.

There's nowhere left to grow anymore :). But if it doesn't change, Alex's delusions of grandeur will increase, which is much worse. The AK is not the Colonial Administration; it's an elected body of players, for players. So, if there are conflicts between AK players, what's the point of having such an AK? I understand that you live in Russia, and it's common for officials to sit in a position and start making decisions. That is, people forget that public service is primarily a service, and only secondarily a source of income and a means of self-realization. But this is in multi-million-strong states. In relatively small communities of free people (which include Heroic communities), the system of maintaining order usually takes a different form – something like sheriffs in the Wild West. That is, the sheriff's power rests on his personal authority, on his ability to clearly justify the fairness of his decisions, and also on his ability to put particularly stubborn people in their place, with words or deeds. Moreover, he has no support from the state apparatus; a sheriff who messes up loses the support of the residents and the ability to perform his functions. So, the behavior of individual members of the AK doesn't resemble the sheriff model at all. It's more like the model of an official in an office, who signs papers and isolates himself from the residents with physical and bureaucratic walls. So, comrades, come out and express your personal opinion, don't hide behind the AK brand. And let it be clear that you really believe that. Because it's better to be sincerely mistaken than to consciously say what you don't believe in, even if it's true.