Leaving Heroes of Might and Magic in protest of Alex’s removal from the Facebook group.

I’m not a fighter at all (and I haven't even registered there yet). Moreover, I believe that any categorical judgments are premature and lead to some losses – the question is whether these losses are justified. But no losses can compare with preserving personal integrity, ensuring that one's personal worldview aligns with what they do. I asked for arguments regarding Alex's removal in the FB-2 thread. Currently, there was suspicion of unfair play, which has not been officially proven. So either prove it (like saying that Zmey brazenly lies, and Alex cannot win without cheating, or he is unsure of his abilities and needs it), and then ban him legally. Or provide an argument for why you are punishing him when there is no cheating (or rather, as far as I understand, you have already determined that it was a misunderstanding, right?). So far, I haven't seen any arguments (maybe I'm blind, maybe I'm thinking wrong – so explain it in a way that I, an idiot, can understand!). I am waiting for arguments. If they exist and are well-founded, I will support them. If they are controversial, I will continue to investigate for the benefit of all residents of Volda. I will perceive avoiding argumentation as arbitrariness. And playing on a resource where arbitrariness is elevated to a virtue is truly disrespectful to oneself. P.S.: The essence of my personal misunderstandings: Here are the rules: /topic/5950/

6. Fair Play The most important point: players must play fairly and respect each other. It is forbidden to use cheat codes and all kinds of "bugs." Also, it is not allowed to open saves or reveal the map in the editor before the end of the game. The game is considered finished when one player has completely destroyed the other or one of them has surrendered, which must be confirmed via ICQ. Only after this is it permissible to open saves.

It is assumed that we act based on these rules. Where does it say anything about spectators? Let's assume I'm a spectator and have the technical ability to open a save file, which I do out of curiosity. In what way am I violating the spirit or even the letter of these rules? Furthermore: In what way is the player responsible if neither the spirit nor the letter of the rules has been violated? The fact that a spectator can tell a player about the situation is just a fairy tale for idiots, even more so than me :D. You can cheat in much more environmentally friendly ways. Therefore: – Either the suspicions that Alex opened the save file himself have not been lifted, but even suspicion is not enough for a verdict; however, the very fact speaks of a complete misunderstanding of the essence of the game by those who suspect. – Or the suspicions have been dropped, but there are some unclear consequences from the rules cited here, based on which you cannot execute him, but you can tie him up. I would really like clarification, and it’s not even about Alex and his authority (although confidence in his lack of need for cheats is based precisely on him), but rather about the approach of local authorities to various life manifestations