Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

I think they're discussing something else over there))
The story of an ill-timed guest

Regarding which there is testimony from the guest and the player, as well as from those who observed and later reported (possibly more than one person).
As for me, for example, I want to compare the quality of play in the first week and the difficulty of taking the Griffin Conservatory, which nearly resulted in a wipe. The extreme cases:
a) a well-played first week and a fairly easy Griffin Conservatory, whose capture ended with unjustifiably heavy losses;
b) playing the entire week poorly and the battle at the Griffin Conservatory fully matching the gameplay of the first week — with intermediate variants possible.
To assess the position that arose at this very 121 in the end.

At least based on this, conclusions can be drawn about the plausibility of the explanations.
And without this, discussing anything is nonsense! You were chosen — so you make the decision, rather than looking for an excuse for the future, like: it wasn't us, you voted that way yourselves.:mad: