Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Hmm... at first glance, I'm shifting the balance in favor of the Warlocks. And they will, of course, resurrect Gur. But the problem is, I don't think the Warlock needs the Warlocks to win. And it turns out that if, during the upcoming night, the Warlocks' first action is directed at Wesker, he will either waste it or remove the protection from himself. Thus, 5 people will remain. Even taking into account the voting restriction, the Warlocks will have to sacrifice one of their own. And that's who we'll execute. And don't be mistaken. When 4 people remain: me, Tako, Ellina, and a Warlock with a kill (if Wesker remains, he will also take on the role of the executed Hermit) - it's still a debatable situation without a clear advantage for either side, because there's a Warlock... In short, think. Offer options. As long as I'm not chasing victory, it's impossible. I'm chasing simplification of the struggle) Splin was wrong...)))