Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
DISCUSSIONS on “Rules for online games in HoMM3 and formulas for calculating player rating.”
+1 for simplifying the rules and minimizing restrictions.
And there's a question:
I've been trying to figure it out for 2 months, but I can't grasp it, no matter what.
5.10. "Wings of the Angel" can be used without any restrictions, unless it contradicts clause 5.13.
So, does this mean I can fly into a treasure room or fly over a guard outpost, and that doesn't contradict clause 5.13?
5.12. It is forbidden to enter adjacent territories without defeating the guard standing at the passage (i.e., if it is moved). If two or three guards are scattered along the road, any one can be defeated. In the absence of a passage guard, including a moved one, it is allowed to freely move from one spawn point to another.
So, does this mean I can't fly into a treasure room or fly over a guard outpost, because that contradicts clause 5.12?
I am entering an adjacent territory without defeating the guard.
5.13. It is forbidden to take Pandora's Boxes, scrolls, artifacts, or visit various objects from under a moved guard without defeating the guard.
Common sense tells me that this means:
It is forbidden to take Pandora's Boxes, scrolls, artifacts, or visit various objects from under a moved guard without defeating the guard of that object beforehand.
But on the other hand, if that's the case, why isn't it written that way?
That is, can I take, say, the Book of Fire, and DEFEAT THE GUARD OF THAT BOOK WITH IT?
Sorry, maybe I don't understand obvious things, but it seems to me that it could be written more clearly