I. A player who wishes to finish the game (Plaintiff) attempts to arrange a time to finish the game via ICQ and private messages on the forum within 1 week after the game has been interrupted/postponed at least 3 times.
Well, it seems to me that this isn't very good... What if the plaintiff only has time to play games on weekends, or doesn't have time at all during the week due to real-life commitments? So, is this a reason for a very rare game to simply disappear?:confused: (It should be 1-2 times, not 3, and not a week, but at least 10 days, IMHO...)
I. A player who wishes to finish the game (Plaintiff) attempts to arrange a time to finish the game via ICQ and private messages on the forum within at least 1 week after the game has been interrupted/postponed at least 3 times.
That is, the requirement to finish the game in this thread should appear no earlier than a week after the interruption. And you need to try to arrange it yourself, without involving a judge. Only after the player is sure that the opponent is ignoring him, then start writing on the forum.
In the case where the game is postponed, the priority remains the same time as when the game started on any of the following days... and the most priority day is exactly one week after the agreement.
In general, you tell your opponent - I'm ready tomorrow, the day after tomorrow, etc., at the same time. If one of you can't, then the deadline is in a week at the same time - whoever can't, loses!
We need to think about it.
Осень-Зима 2013-14.