Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I believe that a hero should be chosen based on their unique ability, which should be as versatile as possible and have a broader impact on the army. Heroes with individual traits that only apply to specific types of combatants (e.g., +1 to archers, +2 to wyvern armor, etc.) lose their "unique ability" in any immediate situation (blindness, mind control, berserk, or simply when your favorite centaurs or assassins are defeated), and that's IT! The hero becomes just another ordinary unit! Of course, this doesn't include their overall level-up. By "broad ability," I mean, for example, Krag's first strike, which can push back overly fast knights, or the ability to increase the attack of the entire army for each enemy killed (I don't remember the name of the hero). In general, all heroes (including those from other factions) whose abilities are more popular and not limited to a specific "stack" (if I understand the local slang correctly:smile09:) are better. IMHO.