Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Captain vs All World. Am I wrong, or is this as outdated as SoD vs TE? Isn't it getting boring?
I asked for constructive feedback, but all I get is pointless chatter.
Many people don't know that:
1. The "lighter" feature appeared – it allows for instant troop exchange between heroes and splitting of units. This was the strongest argument in favor of TE.
2. All World plays on SoD. And All World is much stronger than players from the CIS. For example, the Chinese almost completely dominated us ;) - and that wasn't even their first team (their first team doesn't know English).
There are also Poles, Koreans, Bulgarians... By the way, there's an international tournament going on right now on a Polish website... the main contender is a Bulgarian, and second place is given to a Pole... our players aren't even being considered ;) Because we're a local "All World" :)
On WCL, Black Knight was the king – he probably beat almost everyone, now a Dane is the king there.
Therefore, I ask for constructive feedback. Honestly, I'm interested in the question of how a fully built 2nd-level unit appears in SoD... it's always fully built in secondary locations... it seems like this can be done using text editors.
Дипломатия - искусство говорить собаке "хорошая собачка" до тех пор пока не найдешь подходящую палку.