Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Yes, I agree. That's pretty much how it's done. It's just difficult to fit all cases within the framework of certain rules. And to give organizers recommendations... advice... to limit them in their decision-making... that's not the way to go. If I'm constrained by recommendations within narrow limits, I'll just give up and won't organize anything; I don't need this hassle. Simply brushing off those seeking justice is already tiresome, and I still have to adhere to a bunch of recommendations... :)
On the contrary, then any tournament organizer will have fewer problems – for all questions, there's a rulebook. Although, if some organizers enjoy the freedom to interpret the rules and the constant disputes about it, then good for them =).