We have the quarterfinals. Player AAA won against player BBB. And he (AAA) is in the semifinals. But player CCC didn't play against player DDD; if both have zero scores, then NO ONE advances. They are to blame because they DIDN'T PLAY. Both have zero. Therefore, player AAA has no opponent in the semifinals, and he automatically advances to the final. He is not to blame at all; he didn't even have an opponent. But CCC and DDD are to blame for not being able to agree, or one of them should have forfeited (according to the rule of two zeros). This is exactly what happened with the pair of opponents, Tolikandro. By the way, there haven't been any technical wins yet. We hope that KillerVampire will play. That's it; I don't want to write anything more about this. At least not in the next few days. I just gave some advice for the future regarding the rules, and many people jumped on me, as if I was to blame for something. It's important to understand. I DON'T THINK that with these rules and this outcome, I should have to play in the playoffs. So, don't blame me for anything. But maybe, if the rules were such that there were technical wins instead of two zeros, there might be fewer avoidances of matches and more wins. And fewer dissatisfied people. This was just a SUGGESTION from me. I apologize if I was wrong about anything. I always try to be fair... :)